From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montpas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Mar 30, 1998
997 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 05-98-00253-CR

March 30, 1998.

Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. MC97-B0207-D.

Dismissed.

Mark Joseph Montpas, Dallas, pro se.

Sue Korioth, Kerry P. Fiztgerald, Dallas, for State.

Before Justices LAGARDE, MOSELEY, and BRIDGES.


OPINION


Appellant Mark Joseph Montpas appeals his conviction for driving a vehicle with an expired registration. The trial court assessed a one-dollar fine. In four points of error, appellant complains of various irregularities. For reasons given below, we conclude we have no jurisdiction and dismiss this appeal.

On May 29, 1997, appellant was cited for an expired vehicle registration. The municipal court of Sachse, Texas, found him guilty and fined him seventy-five dollars on June 24, 1997. Appellant appealed to the County Criminal Court of Appeals, Dallas County, Texas. The county court conducted a trial de novo. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.17 (Vernon Supp. 1999). On February 3, 1998, it found appellant guilty and fined him one dollar.

Article 4.03 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure determines our jurisdiction in this matter. It provides:

The Courts of Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of their respective districts in all criminal cases except those in which the death penalty has been assessed. This Article shall not be so construed as to embrace any case which has been appealed from any inferior court to the county court, the county criminal court, or county court at law, in which the fine imposed by the county court, the county criminal court or county court at law does not exceed one hundred dollars, unless the sole issue is the constitutionality of the statute or ordinance on which the conviction is based.

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 4.03 (Vernon Supp. 1999) (emphasis added). Appellant appealed from a municipal court to a county criminal court and the county criminal court imposed a fine that does not exceed one hundred dollars. Appellant does not complain that the statute on which his conviction was based, section 502.407 of the Texas Transportation Code, is unconstitutional. See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 502.407 (Vernon Pamph. 1999). We have no jurisdiction over this appeal.

We dismiss the appeal.


Summaries of

Montpas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Mar 30, 1998
997 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. App. 1998)
Case details for

Montpas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark Joseph MONTPAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas

Date published: Mar 30, 1998

Citations

997 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Dahlstrom v. State

This jurisdiction, however, does not extend to cases that have been appealed from any inferior court to the…

Vanhooser v. State

In issue three, Vanhooser argues the original trial court lacked jurisdiction because the city prosecutor was…