From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montoya v. N.M. Retiree Health Care Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 28, 2019
Civ. No. 18-578 JCH/JFR (D.N.M. Jun. 28, 2019)

Opinion

Civ. No. 18-578 JCH/JFR

06-28-2019

CRYSTAL MONTOYA, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO RETIREE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed June 7, 2019. Doc. 41. Objections were due by no later than June 21, 2019. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 41) are adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Sanctions, or in the Alternative for Dismissal, filed February 11, 2019 (Doc. 26) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth in the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition.

/s/ _________

JUDITH C. HERRERA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Montoya v. N.M. Retiree Health Care Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 28, 2019
Civ. No. 18-578 JCH/JFR (D.N.M. Jun. 28, 2019)
Case details for

Montoya v. N.M. Retiree Health Care Auth.

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL MONTOYA, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO RETIREE HEALTH CARE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jun 28, 2019

Citations

Civ. No. 18-578 JCH/JFR (D.N.M. Jun. 28, 2019)

Citing Cases

Heaton v. Gonzales

Nevertheless, Plaintiffs are “not relieved from disclosing any specific evidence [they] intend[] to utilize…

Gil De La Madrid-Pérez v. Rosado-Rodriguez

Sandoval v. Am. Bldg. c., 267 F.R.D. 257, 282 (D. Minn. 2007) (Finding that if the plaintiffs intend to…