From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 2002
297 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

91499

September 19, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Arthur Montgomery, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting violent conduct, assault on an inmate and possession of a weapon. The misbehavior report relates that petitioner was observed making slashing motions in the direction of another inmate who appeared to be trying to elude him. When petitioner ignored orders to desist, he was forcibly subdued and manacled. A homemade weapon, in the form of a five-inch-long piece of sharpened metal, was found on the floor near petitioner. Both inmates were examined at the facility's infirmary where petitioner's victim was found to have sustained wounds consistent with having been slashed with a sharp instrument.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to charges of fighting and refusing to obey a direct order; hence, that part of the determination finding him guilty of those charges is not in contention.

Contrary to petitioner's assertions, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination finding him guilty of the charged misconduct in the form of the detailed misbehavior report, the use-of-force report, the unusual incident report, a photograph of the weapon that was recovered at the scene and memoranda submitted by three correction officers who witnessed the events in question (see Matter of Krivoi v. Selsky, 284 A.D.2d 677; Matter of Mojica v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 1002, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 752, cert denied 529 U.S. 1039). As substantial evidence supports the determination, it will not be disturbed.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 2002
297 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARTHUR R. MONTGOMERY, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 19, 2002

Citations

297 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
746 N.Y.S.2d 922