From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Conrad

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 9, 2022
3:21-cv-00820 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 9, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00820

11-09-2022

GARY MONTGOMERY Plaintiff, v. THOMAS CONRAD Defendant.


HOLMES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 22) recommending Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 9) be granted and this action dismissed.

The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation were to be filed within fourteen days of service (Doc. No. 22 at 11-12). No objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This Order shall constitute final judgment for purposes of Fed.R.Civ.P. 58. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Conrad

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 9, 2022
3:21-cv-00820 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:GARY MONTGOMERY Plaintiff, v. THOMAS CONRAD Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00820 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 9, 2022)