From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Bataille

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 16, 2012
Case No. 4:10cv73 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10cv73

08-16-2012

JASMINE MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff, v. GRETCHEN BATAILLE, ET AL. Defendant.


(Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant)


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 26, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Polk's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #126] be granted.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Polk's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #126] is GRANTED and Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16 day of August, 2012.

_______________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Bataille

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 16, 2012
Case No. 4:10cv73 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Bataille

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff, v. GRETCHEN BATAILLE, ET AL. Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

Case No. 4:10cv73 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Leachman v. Stephens

The mailroom staff, the DRC members, and the MSCP members answer to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,…

Lisle v. City of Plano

Thus, Plaintiffs contend that since they dispute only the lawfulness of the Second Order, which is not an…