From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montes v. Miller

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 2, 2023
22-cv-07229-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07229-JST

05-02-2023

GIOVANNI MONTES, Plaintiff, v. MILLER, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 21, 2023, Court mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable because Plaintiff was no longer in custody. ECF Nos. 11, 12, 13. N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11 provides that the Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint when: (1) court mail addressed to the pro se party has been returned to the court as not deliverable, and (2) the Court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a written communication from the pro se party indicating a current address. See N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 3-11(b). More than sixty days has passed since court mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 3-11. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Montes v. Miller

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 2, 2023
22-cv-07229-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Montes v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:GIOVANNI MONTES, Plaintiff, v. MILLER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 2, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07229-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)