From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montauk Automatic, Inc. v. Munhall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to vacate its default in failing to oppose the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the complaint. The plaintiff failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its default and produced no affidavit establishing that its claim had merit (see, Bender Bodnar v. Nankin, 186 A.D.2d 524; Moody v. Burgos, 151 A.D.2d 555). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Montauk Automatic, Inc. v. Munhall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Montauk Automatic, Inc. v. Munhall

Case Details

Full title:MONTAUK AUTOMATIC, INC., Appellant, v. THOMAS MUNHALL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 299

Citing Cases

Reilly v. Syosset Hospital

However, even if the conditional order of preclusion and subsequent judgment are deemed to have been entered…

Housberg v. Curtin

In the order dated January 3, 1992, the Supreme Court denied the appellants' motion to vacate the February 6,…