From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monsher v. Dickhaut

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jun 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-12173-NMG (D. Mass. Jun. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-12173-NMG

06-21-2012

MARK MONSHER, Petitioner, v. THOMAS DICKHAUT, Respondent.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

BOAL, M.J.

On December 14, 2010, Mark Mosher ("Mosher"), who is currently serving a life sentence in a Massachusetts correctional facility, petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as amended by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) ("Petition"). (Docket No. 1). The Respondent, Thomas Dickhaut, opposes the Petition. (Docket No. 16).

Petitioner's last name is misspelled in the caption of the case. The correct spelling is Mosher. Accordingly, the Court will refer to petitioner as Mosher, except when referencing the caption of the case, which has not been formally amended.

In his Petition, Mosher relies on the following basis for habeas relief: (1) his Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel was violated because his counsel had a conflict of interest (Petition at 6-7, 23); and (2) his Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel was violated


Summaries of

Monsher v. Dickhaut

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jun 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-12173-NMG (D. Mass. Jun. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Monsher v. Dickhaut

Case Details

Full title:MARK MONSHER, Petitioner, v. THOMAS DICKHAUT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Jun 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-12173-NMG (D. Mass. Jun. 21, 2012)