Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 3:00CV-161-P-D.
August 18, 2010
ORDER GRANTING ENLARGEMENT OF PAGE LIMITATION FOR REPLY BRIEF
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Motion of MITCHELL SCRUGGS, ET AL., Defendants herein (collectively "Scruggs"), with the consent of counsel for Plaintiff Monsanto, for a formal enlargement of the page limitation by three for Scruggs' Reply Brief [Doc 823] to Monsanto's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony and Opinions of Mark E. Hoffman Regarding Damages [Doc 805]. Upon consideration of the Motion, including Monsanto's consent thereto, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is,
ORDERED: That Defendants Scruggs should be, and they hereby are, granted an enlargement of the page limitation imposed by Local Rule 7(b)(5), and that the Reply Brief [Doc 823] being eight pages in length and timely filed Friday, August 6, 2010, shall be, and it hereby is, accepted as conforming to the normal page limitation, as hereby extended by three pages.