From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monroe v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 18, 2013
No. 62789 (Nev. Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 62789

04-18-2013

DAIMON MONROE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a proper person appeal from a decision determining appellant to be a vexatious litigant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from a vexatious litigant determination entered in a criminal case, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

It appears that if any remedy from the vexatious litigant determination is available in this case it is by an original petition for a writ of prohibition, NRS 34.320; NRAP 21, arguing that the district court has exceeded its jurisdiction in preventing appellant from filing documents collaterally attacking his judgment of conviction. Similarly, the failure to file a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus submitted by appellant may be challenged in an original petition for a writ of mandamus. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21.

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

_________________, J.

Hardesty
_________________, J.
Parraguirre
_________________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge

Daimon Monroe

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Monroe v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 18, 2013
No. 62789 (Nev. Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Monroe v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAIMON MONROE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

No. 62789 (Nev. Apr. 18, 2013)