From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monnheimer v. Nielsen

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Dec 19, 2008
Case No. 1:08cv356 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08cv356.

December 19, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 24, 2008 (Doc. 19).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is DENIED. This matter to proceed for further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Monnheimer v. Nielsen

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Dec 19, 2008
Case No. 1:08cv356 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Monnheimer v. Nielsen

Case Details

Full title:Michael C. Monnheimer, Plaintiff, v. A.C. Nielsen, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Dec 19, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:08cv356 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Maseru v. Univ. of Cincinnati

The Court deems the intake questionnaire completed by plaintiff on September 26, 2017 to be a "charge of…

Covert v. Cellco P'ship

In similar cases, courts have held plaintiffs showed "diligence," and have tolled the plaintiffs’ filing…