From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monmouth Plan. Parent. v. Cannizzaro

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
May 21, 1987
217 N.J. Super. 623 (App. Div. 1987)

Summary

adopting opinion of Chancery Division

Summary of this case from Armes v. City of Philadelphia

Opinion

Argued March 25, 1987 —

Decided May 21, 1987.

Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and HAVEY.

Appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Monmouth County.

William F. Dowd, argued the cause for individual appellants.

Richard Ansell argued the cause for respondent ( Anschelewitz, Barr Ansell, attorneys, Susan T. Robbins, on the brief).

Traynor Hogan, for appellant Monmouth County Right to Life Committee filed a brief, no appearance was made on their behalf.


The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Selikoff in his opinion reported at 204 N.J. Super. 531 (Ch.Div. 1985).


Summaries of

Monmouth Plan. Parent. v. Cannizzaro

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
May 21, 1987
217 N.J. Super. 623 (App. Div. 1987)

adopting opinion of Chancery Division

Summary of this case from Armes v. City of Philadelphia

adopting opinion of Chancery Division

Summary of this case from Sunnyside v. Lopez
Case details for

Monmouth Plan. Parent. v. Cannizzaro

Case Details

Full title:PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: May 21, 1987

Citations

217 N.J. Super. 623 (App. Div. 1987)
526 A.2d 741

Citing Cases

Sunnyside v. Lopez

However, the courts of New Jersey, which interpret its constitutional free speech provision in the same…

Options v. Lawson

While our Supreme Court has recognized health and accessibility of medical services as rights protectable…