From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moniodes v. Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 12, 2021
20 CIVIL 5648 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 5648 (GHW)

08-12-2021

NICHOLAS MONIODES, Plaintiff, v. AUTONOMY CAPITAL (JERSEY) LP, AUTONOMY AMERICAS LLC d/b/a AUTONOMY CAPITAL, ROBERT GIBBINS, and IVAN RITOSSA, in their individual and professional capacities, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated August 11, 2021, because Plaintiff has alleged that he provided information to the SEC by telephone, not by one of the means listed under Exchange Act Rule 21F9(a), Plaintiff has failed to allege that he was a whistleblower under Dodd-Frank and thus has failed to state a claim for retaliation. Defendants' motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is therefore GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Moniodes v. Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 12, 2021
20 CIVIL 5648 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Moniodes v. Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS MONIODES, Plaintiff, v. AUTONOMY CAPITAL (JERSEY) LP, AUTONOMY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 5648 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021)