From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monica v. Calvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 18, 2007
44 A.D.3d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 501894.

October 18, 2007.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (Walsh, J.), entered November 13, 2006, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to adjudicate respondent's children to be abused and/or neglected.

Sandra M. Colatosti, Albany, for Appellant.

Jeffrey G. Kennedy, Department of Children, Youth and Families, Albany, for Respondent.

George V. Collins III, Law Guardian, Albany. Jaya Connors, Law Guardian, Delmar.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


Respondent, the father of three children, admitted that he had sexual contact with his eldest daughter and consented, as a part of this admission, to a finding of derivative neglect of the two younger siblings. He appeals, arguing only that the conduct to which he admitted was insufficient to support a finding of derivative neglect.

An adjudication of neglect entered upon the consent of a respondent cannot be reviewed on appeal, as the respondent is not an aggrieved party ( see Matter of Elijah Q., 36 AD3d 974, 975, lv denied 8 NY3d 809; Matter of Amber W, 22 AD3d 967, 968, Iv denied 6 NY3d 708). Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Monica v. Calvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 18, 2007
44 A.D.3d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Monica v. Calvin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MONICA T. and Others, Children Alleged to be Abused and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7795
842 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

In re Fantasia

Family Court then entered a fact-finding and dispositional order which, as relevant here, adjudicated the…

In re Ee

Because the subject order was entered with the mother's consent and she failed to make a timely application…