From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monegro v. Carington Tea Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 30, 2021
21-CV-1513 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-1513 (RA)

06-30-2021

FRANKIE MONEGRO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. THE CARRINGTON TEA COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff served Defendant in this matter on March 12, 2021. Dkt. 13. On March 25, the Court granted Defendant a sixty-day extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Dkt. 12. Defendant's answer was therefore due on June 2, 2021. Id. To date, Defendant has not filed an answer. No later than July 9, 2021, Plaintiff shall notify the Court whether he intends to move for default judgment. In the event Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court may dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 41(b). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Monegro v. Carington Tea Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 30, 2021
21-CV-1513 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Monegro v. Carington Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE MONEGRO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

21-CV-1513 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)