From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monegro v. Munico Corp.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 19, 2021
21-cv-4661 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-4661 (AJN)

07-19-2021

Frankie Monegro, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Munico Corporation, Defendant.


ORDER

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge.

It having been reported to this Court that this case has been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis.

All scheduled conferences and deadlines are hereby adjourned. Within the sixty-day period provided for in this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Dismissal for the Court to So Order. Pursuant to Rule 5.A. of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless the terms of the agreement are made part of the public record.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Monegro v. Munico Corp.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 19, 2021
21-cv-4661 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Monegro v. Munico Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Frankie Monegro, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

21-cv-4661 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2021)