From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monclova v. Unger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 12, 2014
12 Civ. 1127 (AT) (FM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 12, 2014)

Opinion

12 Civ. 1127 (AT) (FM)

05-12-2014

JOSE MONCLOVA, Petitioner, v. DAVID M. UNGER, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

On February 9, 2012, Petitioner, Jose Monclova, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 2, 2012, the Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas.

After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Maas issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R"), proposing that Petitioner's petition be denied. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. Dunham v. City of New York, No. 11 Civ 1223, 2013 WL 929029, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2013). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Maas's R & R in its entirety. Petitioner's petition is DENIED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this order to Pro Se Petitioner.

SO ORDERED. Dated: May 12, 2014

New York, New York

__________

ANAILSA TORRES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Monclova v. Unger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 12, 2014
12 Civ. 1127 (AT) (FM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Monclova v. Unger

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MONCLOVA, Petitioner, v. DAVID M. UNGER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 12, 2014

Citations

12 Civ. 1127 (AT) (FM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 12, 2014)