From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molano v. Bezio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 505552.

March 19, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Carl Molano, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Kane, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul and expunge from his institutional record the administrative determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violent conduct and assault. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief he requested, this proceeding is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Correnti v Leclaire, 52 AD3d 1153; Matter of Wong v Coughlin, 182 AD2d 926, 927).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Molano v. Bezio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Molano v. Bezio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARL MOLANO, Petitioner, v. NORMAN R. BEZIO, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 1233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1908
874 N.Y.S.2d 394

Citing Cases

In re Tafari

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Abreu v. Bezio

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…