Mojo Ideas, Inc. v. J.W. Constr. Co.

Full title: MOJO IDEAS, INC., Plaintiff, v. J.W. CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 15, 2012

Case No. 1:11-cv-3134-CL (D. Or. Jun. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-3134-CL

06-15-2012

MOJO IDEAS, INC., Plaintiff, v. J.W. CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant.

OWEN M. FANNER

ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that plaintiff has not shown that this court has personal jurisdiction over 'defendant. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#17) is adopted. Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (#6) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

OWEN M. FANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE