From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moise v. Maryland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2021
No. 21-6879 (4th Cir. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-6879

09-14-2021

RICHARD D. MOISE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; LARRY HOGAN, Governor, Defendants - Appellees.

Richard D. Moise, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 9, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-03330-RDB)

Richard D. Moise, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Richard D. Moise, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and denying his motion to amend the judgment. In his complaint, Moise asserted an access-to-courts claim based on a state postconviction court's decision that required Moise to litigate his postconviction claims through counsel. Because the Sixth Amendment right to self-representation does not extend beyond a defendant's criminal trial, Martinez v. Ct. of Appeal of Cal., 528 U.S. 152, 160, 163 (2000), we agree that dismissal was warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Moise v. Maryland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2021
No. 21-6879 (4th Cir. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Moise v. Maryland

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD D. MOISE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; LARRY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

No. 21-6879 (4th Cir. Sep. 14, 2021)

Citing Cases

Ragland v. NC Div. of Emp't Sec.

Fourth, § 1983 is an avenue to vindicate other federal statutory or constitutional rights, but Ragland has…

Ragland v. NC Div. of Emp't Sec.

This language “implies a right of self-representation” in criminal prosecutions, Faretta v. California, 422…