From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moise v. Fields

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 17, 2020
19-CV-11964 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2020)

Opinion

19-CV-11964 (LLS)

04-17-2020

EDDIE MOISE, Petitioner, v. LEROY FIELDS, Respondent.


ORDER :

Petitioner, currently incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brings this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he challenges his May 28, 2014 judgment of conviction in the New York Supreme Court, New York County. On April 9, 2020, the Court received Petitioner's $5.00 filing fee.

The Court directs Petitioner to file a declaration within sixty days of the date of this order showing cause why the Court should not deny the petition as time-barred.

DISCUSSION

A. Statute of Limitations

Petitioner's petition may be time-barred. A prisoner seeking habeas relief under § 2254 must generally file a petition within one year from the latest of four benchmark dates: (1) when the judgment of conviction becomes final; (2) when a government-created impediment to making such a motion is removed; (3) when the constitutional right asserted is initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if it has been made retroactively available to cases on collateral review; or (4) when the facts supporting the claim(s) could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

Petitioner alleges that on May 28, 2014, he was convicted in the New York Supreme Court, New York County. Court records indicate that on November 15, 2016, the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the conviction, see People v. Moise, 144 A.D.3d 491 (1st Dep't 2016), and that the New York Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal on January 18, 2017, see 28 N.Y.3d 1148 (2017). Petitioner's conviction consequently became final on April 28, 2017, following "the expiration of [the] 90-day period of time to petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States," Warren v. Garvin, 219 F.3d 111, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). Petitioner then had one year from that date to file his petition. Petitioner placed this petition in the prison mail collection box on December 10, 2019, well after the one-year limitations period expired.

When postconviction motions are filed before the expiration of the statute of limitations, those motions and related state-court proceedings may toll the statute of limitations. See § 2244(d)(2). Postconviction motions filed after the limitations period expires, however, do not start the limitations period anew. "[P]roper calculation of Section 2244(d)(2)'s tolling provision excludes time during which properly filed state relief applications are pending but does not reset the date from which the one-year statute of limitations begins to run." Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir. 2000). Section 2244(d)(2) applies only if a petitioner's postconviction motion was pending within the one-year limitations period.

Here, Petitioner alleges that on September 9, 2018, he filed a motion to vacate his judgment under N.Y. C.P.L. § 440.10. But this motion was filed after the one-year limitations period expired; therefore, it does not appear to toll the limitations period. See § 2244(d)(2).

B. Leave to File Declaration

The Court therefore directs Petitioner to file a declaration within sixty days of the date of this order stating why this petition should not be denied as time-barred. Petitioner should allege any facts showing that he has been pursuing his rights diligently and that some extraordinary circumstance prevented him from timely submitting this petition. See Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010) (holding that one-year limitations period under § 2244(d) for habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is subject to equitable tolling in appropriate cases).

Petitioner should also include in the declaration a listing of (1) the dates that all postconviction applications in state court challenging this conviction were filed, including any petition for a writ of error coram nobis, all motions under N.Y. Crim. Proc. L. § 440, and any other postconviction applications, (2) when any postconviction applications were decided, (3) the dates that any appeals or applications for leave to appeal from those decisions were filed, (4) when those appeals or applications were decided, and (5) when Petitioner received notice of any state-court decisions on those applications and appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). --------

CONCLUSION

Chambers will mail a copy of this order to Petitioner.

The Court grants Petitioner leave to file a declaration within sixty days of the date of this order showing why the Court should deny the petition as time barred. A declaration form is attached to this order. If Petitioner timely files a declaration, the Court shall review it, and if proper, shall order the Respondent to answer. If Petitioner fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, and cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the Court will deny the petition as time-barred. No answer shall be required at this time.

Because Petitioner has not at this time made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 17, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

Louis L. Stanton

U.S.D.J. __________ Write the first and last name of each plaintiff or petitioner. -against- __________ Write the first and last name of each defendant or respondent. Case No. ___ CV __________

DECLARATION

__________ Briefly explain above the purpose of the declaration, for example, "in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment," or "in Response to Order to Show Cause." I, __________ , declare under penalty of perjury that the following facts are true and correct:

In the space below, describe any facts that are relevant to the motion or that respond to a court order. You may also refer to and attach any relevant documents.
__________ Attach additional pages and documents if necessary. __________
Executed on (date)

__________

Signature __________
Name

__________

Prison Identification # (if incarcerated) __________
Address __________
City __________
State __________
Zip Code __________
Telephone Number (if available)

__________

E-mail Address (if available)


Summaries of

Moise v. Fields

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 17, 2020
19-CV-11964 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Moise v. Fields

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE MOISE, Petitioner, v. LEROY FIELDS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 17, 2020

Citations

19-CV-11964 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2020)