Opinion
2021-07453
12-23-2021
v. MARK SMITH, CHERYL MATTERN, SAMUEL WESTMORELAND, MOHAMMED KAASHMIRI, FREDERIC JOYCE, JONATHAN ELI-PHILLIPS, REGINA FARRELL, TINA ANN MAXIAN, KENNETH KIM, JORGE FERREIRO, LEROY COOLEY, ANKUR CHAWLA, MARIO CARRILLO, MARGARET ALBANESE, NATALIE JONES, EMIR HODZIC, ROBERT WASICZKO, MARK WILLIAMS, JOHN SPERLING, KENNETH ORTEGA, COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (KYLE D. GOOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. COHEN COMPAGNI BECKMAN APPLER & KNOLL, PLLC, SYRACUSE (LAURA L. SPRING OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS MARK SMITH, SAMUEL WESTMORELAND, FREDERIC JOYCE, JONATHAN ELI-PHILLIPS, REGINA FARRELL, TINA ANN MAXIAN, KENNETH KIM, JORGE FERREIRO, LEROY COOLEY, ANKUR
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (KYLE D. GOOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
COHEN COMPAGNI BECKMAN APPLER & KNOLL, PLLC, SYRACUSE (LAURA L. SPRING OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS MARK SMITH, SAMUEL WESTMORELAND, FREDERIC JOYCE, JONATHAN ELI-PHILLIPS, REGINA FARRELL, TINA ANN MAXIAN, KENNETH KIM, JORGE FERREIRO, LEROY COOLEY, ANKUR
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered September 3, 2020. The judgment, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.