From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moguel v. Arya

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 14, 2023
2:22-cv-01082 DB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01082 DB

11-14-2023

TYRONE MERVYN MOGUEL, Plaintiff, v. ARYA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. On August 3, 2023, this court referred this case to the court's Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed it for 120 days. Defendants were given 60 days to file any motion to opt out of the Project. Defendants now seek a second extension of time to file any motion to opt out. Defendants' counsel states that they require additional time to confer with all defendants and evaluate plaintiff's claims. Defendants have shown good cause for a 21-day extension of time. However, no further extensions will be granted.

Accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 60) is granted.


Summaries of

Moguel v. Arya

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 14, 2023
2:22-cv-01082 DB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Moguel v. Arya

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE MERVYN MOGUEL, Plaintiff, v. ARYA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 14, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01082 DB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)