From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moenig v. New York Central Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 7, 1921
132 N.E. 902 (N.Y. 1921)

Opinion

Argued May 10, 1921

Decided June 7, 1921

Joseph B. Thompson and Henry W. Hill for appellants.

George H. Walker, Crosby J. Beakes and Alexander S. Lyman for New York Central Railroad Company, respondent.

Ernest P. Hoes and Charles D. Millard for Village of Tarrytown, respondent.

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( Edward H. Leggett of counsel), for State of New York.


Judgment in first case affirmed, with costs, on opinion of BLACKMAR, J., below. Judgment in each other case affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Moenig v. New York Central Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 7, 1921
132 N.E. 902 (N.Y. 1921)
Case details for

Moenig v. New York Central Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:FRANK C. MOENIG, Appellant, v . NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 7, 1921

Citations

132 N.E. 902 (N.Y. 1921)
132 N.E. 902

Citing Cases

Northern Terminal Corp. of N.Y. v. Butterly

The plaintiff's theory and contention are that, such deed being a conveyance in fee of the property as…

Nevins v. Friedauer

" I do not find anything inconsistent with these principles in Bardes v. Herman ( 62 Misc. Rep. 428; affd.,…