Opinion
04-22-00206-CV
04-21-2022
MODIVCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC formerly known as LogistiCare Solutions, LLC, Appellant v. Fidencio GALLARDO, Josefina Gallardo, Juliana Gallardo, Maria Doloroes Zertuche, AnaDelia Gallardo, Fidencion Gallardo Castillo, Jr., Fermin Gallardo, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Maria Gallardo Castillo, deceased, Appellees
From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CVA001485D3 Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice, Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Modivcare Solutions, LLC, formerly known as Logisticare Solutions, LLC, filed a notice of interlocutory appeal citing section 51.014(a)(8) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The statute is reserved for governmental units. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.014, 101.001.
Based on the record, we conclude Appellant is not a governmental unit under section 101.001. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 101.001; Univ. of the Incarnate Word v. Redus (Redus I), 518 S.W.3d 905, 911 (Tex. 2017); Orion Real Estate v. Sarro, 559 S.W.3d 599, 602-03 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2018, no pet.); Gonzales Nursing Operations, LLC v. Smith, No. 04-20-00102-CV, 2020 WL 5646482, at *3 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Sept. 23, 2020, pet. denied) (mem. op.); AECOM USA, Inc. v. Mata, No. 04-15-00773-CV, 2016 WL 5112222, at *2, *4 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Sept. 21, 2016, pet. denied) (mem. op.).
Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction to consider Appellants' interlocutory appeal. See Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840-43 (Tex. 2007).
However, Appellant asked that, if we concluded we do not have appellate jurisdiction for an interlocutory appeal, we treat their filing as a petition for writ of mandamus. Appellant's request is granted. We direct the Clerk of the Court to change the designation of appellate cause number 04-22-00206-CV from an appeal to an original proceeding, and this court will review the petition accordingly. See CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 453 (Tex. 2011).
Because no petition has yet been filed, this case will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in ten days, unless Appellant files a petition for writ of mandamus that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3 in the interim.
It is so ORDERED.