From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moczo v. Heath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 6, 2016
12 Civ. 8509 (AT)(RLE) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2016)

Opinion

12 Civ. 8509 (AT)(RLE)

06-06-2016

JASON MOCZO, Petitioner, v. PHILIP D. HEATH, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION :

On November 19, 2012, Petitioner pro se, Jason Moczo, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On August 15, 2013, the Court referred the matter to the Honorable Ronald L. Ellis. ECF No. 9.

After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Ellis issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R & R"), recommending that the petition be (1) dismissed, on the basis that Moczo has failed to exhaust the claims in his petition, or (2) denied, on the basis that, even if he had exhausted those claims, they lack merit. ECF No. 26. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. E.g., Gilford v. Racette, No. 13 Civ. 5881, 2015 WL 7430825, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2015). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety. The petition is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner pro se.

SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2016

New York, New York

/s/ _________

ANALISA TORRES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Moczo v. Heath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 6, 2016
12 Civ. 8509 (AT)(RLE) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Moczo v. Heath

Case Details

Full title:JASON MOCZO, Petitioner, v. PHILIP D. HEATH, Superintendent, Sing Sing…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 6, 2016

Citations

12 Civ. 8509 (AT)(RLE) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2016)