Opinion
Robert L. Mack, Jr., Lithonia, for appellant.
Keith C. Martin, Solicitor-General, for appellee.
BARNES, Judge.
Lloyd Mobley appeals from his conviction of driving with a suspended license, contending the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to go forward. Mobley asserts that the arresting officer failed to comply with the following requirement of OCGA § 40-5-121(b)(1): "The charge of driving with a suspended or disqualified license shall not be made where the suspension is a result of a failure to respond under Code Section 40-5-56 or an insurance cancellation unless the arresting officer has verified a service date and such date is placed on the uniform citation." The record in this case shows that Mobley's license was suspended under OCGA § 40-5-56 for failing to appear at a hearing for a traffic offense and that the officer arrested him for driving with a suspended license. Instead of issuing a citation to Mobley, however, the officer took him into custody and obtained an arrest warrant. Mobley was never given a uniform citation listing the service date nor a copy of his arrest warrant.
In State v. Brooks, 194 Ga.App. 465, 390 S.E.2d 673 (1990), we interpreted a broader predecessor to the current version of OCGA § 40-5-121(b)(1) in a case in which the officer did not verify and place the service date on the uniform citation issued to the appellant. We held that "under the clear mandate of ... the statute ..., no charge of driving with a suspended license could be made against appellant." Id. at 466, 390 S.E.2d 673. As in Brooks, supra, "we may not sanction noncompliance [with the statute] because we perceive it to be unnecessary or cumbersome." Id.
Judgment reversed.
SMITH, P.J., and PHIPPS, J., concur.