Mobilfone of N.E. Pa., Inc. v. Pa. P.U.C

2 Citing cases

  1. Mobilfone of N.E. Pa., Inc. v. Pa. P.U.C

    458 A.2d 1030 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)   Cited 4 times

    Because that May 9, 1980 remand order involved matters relevant to this case, the ALJ also reopened the record in Hazle-Tone's application that is now before us, consolidating the transfer application and this application in one hearing, because the testimony regarding the financial fitness of Hazle-Tone was equally relevant to both applications. The PUC later approved the transfer application, docketed at A100457, Folder 2, and this court affirmed that decision in Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 67 Pa. Commw. 219, 446 A.2d 1001 (1982), discussed below. ALJ Cohen issued an initial decision in this certificate of public convenience application, recommending approval of Hazle-Tone's application on April 23, 1981, and on June 19, 1981, Judge Cohen issued his final opinion, again recommending approval of Hazle-Tone's application.

  2. Pennsylvania Elec. Co. v. Pa. P.U.C

    473 A.2d 704 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1984)   Cited 6 times

    We have been asked to decide if the PUC violated Penelec's due process rights or committed an error of law by using the PUC's Waldron rule to resolve this overbilling dispute and if substantial evidence supports the commission's decision. See Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 67 Pa. Commw. 219, 222, 446 A.2d 1001, 1003 (1982). In their complaint, the Piatts claimed that their electric bills of February 10 and April 13, 1982 were abnormally high.