From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moberley et al. v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1915
149 P. 1144 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4700

Opinion Filed June 8, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiffs in error have filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge.

Action by C. R. Whitney against Major Moberley and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

J. V. Cabell and Dumars Vaught, for plaintiffs in error.

Warren K. Snyder, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on January 6, 1913. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Moberley et al. v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1915
149 P. 1144 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Moberley et al. v. Whitney

Case Details

Full title:MOBERLEY et al. v. WHITNEY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 8, 1915

Citations

149 P. 1144 (Okla. 1915)
149 P. 1144