M.M. v. Agency For Health Care Admin.

Full title: M.M., Appellant, v. Agency for Health Care Administration, et al.…

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

No. 3D21-0600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2022)

Opinion

3D21-0600

01-12-2022

M.M., Appellant, v. Agency for Health Care Administration, et al., Appellees.

Lopez Legal, P.A., and Alejandra Arroyave Lopez, for appellant. Eugenia Keough Rains, Assistant General Counsel (Tallahassee); Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, and Craig H. Smith, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, Office of Fair Hearings Lower Tribunal Nos. AHCA 20-FH2635 & OP2047580263.

Lopez Legal, P.A., and Alejandra Arroyave Lopez, for appellant.

Eugenia Keough Rains, Assistant General Counsel (Tallahassee); Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, and Craig H. Smith, for appellees.

Before SCALES, MILLER and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. 1

M.M. appeals a final order entered by a hearing officer from the State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration that approved the termination of forty hours per week of adult companion services provided to M.M. as a Medicaid benefit for the month of October 2020. We are not free to substitute our judgment for that of a hearing officer, nor may we reweigh the evidence presented at the administrative hearing. § 120.68(7)(b), (10), Fla. Stat. (2020); Bagarotti v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n, 208 So.3d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Our review is limited to whether the hearing officer's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Id. In this case, they are. We are therefore compelled to affirm.

Affirmed. 2