From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mizelle v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 29, 2021
312 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1390

01-29-2021

Mark MIZELLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mizelle v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 29, 2021
312 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Mizelle v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK MIZELLE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 29, 2021

Citations

312 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)