From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mixson v. Lombard

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Aug 12, 2011
C/A No. 2:11-1468-MBS-PJG (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2011)

Summary

concluding that, where the complaint acknowledged that the plaintiff no longer remained in pretrial custody on charges as to which the state magistrate allegedly had set an excessive bail, " [p]laintiff is not entitled to the declaratory relief that he seeks . . . because he does not ask the court to define the parties' rights in the future, he seeks merely a declaration from the court that [the state magistrate] violated his rights in the past"

Summary of this case from Lore v. Wilkes

Opinion

C/A No. 2:11-1468-MBS-PJG.

August 12, 2011


ORDER


This is a civil action filed by a local prisoner. Therefore, in the event that a limitations issue arises, Plaintiff shall have the benefit of the holding in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner's pleading was filed at the moment of delivery to prison authorities for forwarding to District Court). Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge.

PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE:

By filing this case, Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the United States of America in the amount of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. This debt is not dischargeable in the event Plaintiff seeks relief under the bankruptcy provisions of the United States Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(17). A prisoner is permitted to file a civil action without prepayment of fees or security therefor under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Form AO 240) to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), which is construed as a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF No. 2.) A review of the Motion reveals that Plaintiff does not have the funds to prepay the filing fee.

Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is granted.

TO THE CLERK OF COURT:

This case is subject to summary dismissal based on an initial screening conducted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Therefore, the Clerk of Court shall not issue the summonses or forward this matter to the United States Marshal for service of process at this time.

The Clerk of Court shall not enter any change of address submitted by Plaintiff which directs that mail be sent to a person other than Plaintiff unless that person is an attorney admitted to practice before this Court who has entered a formal appearance.

TO PLAINTIFF:

Plaintiff must place the civil action number listed above (C/A No. 2:11-1468-MBS-PJG) on any document provided to the Court pursuant to this Order. Any future filings in this case must be sent to the Clerk of Court, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. All documents requiring Plaintiff's signature shall be signed with Plaintiff's full legal name written in Plaintiff's own handwriting. Pro se litigants shall not use the "s/typed name" format used in the Electronic Case Filing System. In all future filings with this Court, Plaintiff is directed to use letter-sized (81/2 inches by 11 inches) paper only, to write or type text on one side of a sheet of paper only and not to write or type on both sides of any sheet of paper. Plaintiff is further instructed not to write to the edge of the paper, but to maintain one inch margins on the top, bottom, and sides of each paper submitted.

Plaintiff is a pro se litigant. Plaintiff's attention is directed to the following important notice:

You are ordered to always keep the Clerk of Court advised in writing (901 Richland Street, Columbia, South carolina 29201) if your address changes for any reason, so as to assure that orders or other matters that specify deadlines for you to meet will be received by you. If as a result of your failure to comply with this Order, you fail to meet a deadline set by this Court, your case may be dismissed for violating this Order. Therefore, if you have a change of address before this case is ended, you must comply with this Order by immediately advising the Clerk of Court in writing of such change of address and providing the Court with the docket number of all pending cases you have filed with this Court. Your failure to do so will not be excused by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION. . . . PLEASE READ CAREFULLY WARNING TO PRO SE PARTY OR NONPARTY FILERS

All Documents That You File with the Court Will Be Available to the Public on the Internet Through Pacer (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) and the Court's Electronic Case Filing System. CERTAIN PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN OR SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM ALL DOCUMENTS BEFORE YOU SUBMIT THE DOCUMENTS TO THE COURT FOR FILING.

Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for privacy protection of electronic or paper filings made with the court. Rule 5.2 applies to ALL documents submitted for filing, including pleadings, exhibits to pleadings, discovery responses, and any other document submitted by any party or nonparty for filing. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, a party or nonparty filer should not put certain types of an individual's personal identifying information in documents submitted for filing to any United States District Court. If it is necessary to file a document that already contains personal identifying information, the personal identifying information should be "blacked out" or redacted prior to submitting the document to the Clerk of Court for filing. A person filing any document containing their own personal identifying information waives the protection of Rule 5.2(a) by filing the information without redaction and not under seal.

1. Personal information protected by Rule 5.2(a): (a) Social Security and Taxpayer identification numbers. If an individual's social security number or a taxpayer identification number must be included in a document, the filer may include only the last four digits of that number.

(b) Names of Minor Children. If the involvement of a minor child must be mentioned, the filer may include only the initials of that child.

(c) Dates of Birth. If an individual's date of birth must be included in a document, the filer may include only the year of birth.

(d) Financial Account Numbers. If financial account numbers are relevant, the filer may include only the last four digits of these numbers.

2. Protection of other sensitive personal information — such as driver's license numbers and alien registration numbers — may be sought under Rule 5.2(d) (Filings Made Under Seal) and (e) (Protective Orders).


Summaries of

Mixson v. Lombard

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Aug 12, 2011
C/A No. 2:11-1468-MBS-PJG (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2011)

concluding that, where the complaint acknowledged that the plaintiff no longer remained in pretrial custody on charges as to which the state magistrate allegedly had set an excessive bail, " [p]laintiff is not entitled to the declaratory relief that he seeks . . . because he does not ask the court to define the parties' rights in the future, he seeks merely a declaration from the court that [the state magistrate] violated his rights in the past"

Summary of this case from Lore v. Wilkes
Case details for

Mixson v. Lombard

Case Details

Full title:Daniel Mark Mixson, Plaintiff, v. Judge Linda Lombard; Sheriff Al Cannon…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: Aug 12, 2011

Citations

C/A No. 2:11-1468-MBS-PJG (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2011)

Citing Cases

Lore v. Wilkes

(See id. at 4-5.) Plaintiffs thus cannot secure declaratory relief. See Mixson v. Lombard, C/A No. 2:11-1468,…