From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mixon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 9, 1997
945 S.W.2d 383 (Ark. 1997)

Opinion

CR 97-452

Opinion delivered June 9, 1997

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — The submission of an affidavit accepting responsibility for failing to perfect an appeal by the attorney for a criminal defendant is good cause to treat a motion for rule on the clerk as one for belated appeal and to grant the motion.

Motion for Rule on Clerk Treated as Motion for Belated Appeal; granted.

John Stroud III, for appellant.

No response.


The appellant, Clarence Mixon, has previously filed a motion for rule on the clerk. See Mixon v. State, 328 Ark. 534, 944 S.W.2d 829 (1997). We denied the motion because Mixon's attorney, John Stroud III, had not admitted fault for filing the notice of appeal prior to the entry of the judgment and commitment order. Mr. Stroud has since submitted an affidavit accepting responsibility for failing to perfect Mixon's appeal.

[1] We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to treat the motion as one for belated appeal and grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Mixon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 9, 1997
945 S.W.2d 383 (Ark. 1997)
Case details for

Mixon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Clarence MIXON v . STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 9, 1997

Citations

945 S.W.2d 383 (Ark. 1997)
945 S.W.2d 383

Citing Cases

Harris v. State

The last adverse ruling occurred when the State sought to introduce the gun retrieved into evidence. The…