From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitsoff v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 20, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-46 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-46

08-20-2013

DAVID K. MITSOFF, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #22) IN ITS

ENTIRETY; SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REQUESTING

APPROVAL OF JOINT STIPULATION (DOC. #21); AWARDING

PLAINTIFF $2,807.00 IN FEES AND COSTS UNDER THE EQUAL

ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, in his Report and Recommendation, filed August 1, 2013 (Doc. #22), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety. The Court notes that no objections have been filed by either party within the time allotted.

Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Approval of Joint Stipulation (Doc. #21) is SUSTAINED, and Plaintiff is AWARDED $2,807.00 in fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d).

This case shall remain terminated upon the Court's docket.

____________________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitsoff v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 20, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-46 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Mitsoff v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID K. MITSOFF, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-46 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2013)