From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchum v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-02533-JPM-dkv (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-02533-JPM-dkv

03-27-2020

KENNETH NATHANIEL MITCHUM, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo on February 3, 2020. (ECF No. 30.) In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court affirm the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Plaintiff Kenneth Mitchum's claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. (Id. at PageID 1807-08.)

"Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Plaintiff Anthony Robinson has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections expired on September 11, 2019. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).

"When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note. On clear-error review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff's claim for social security insurance benefits.

The Court also ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's findings with respect to Plaintiff's claims the United States government discriminated against him based on his age, race, and sex, as well as his fraud claim asserted against the United States. (See ECF No. 30 at PageID 1838-40.) Those claims are also DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED, this 27th day of March, 2020.

/s/ Jon P. McCalla

JON P. McCALLA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitchum v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-02533-JPM-dkv (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Mitchum v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH NATHANIEL MITCHUM, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-02533-JPM-dkv (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 27, 2020)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Kijakazi

P. 72 Advisory Committee Note Subdivision (b) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only…

Wood v. Saul

P. 72 Advisory Committee Note Subdivision (b) ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only…