From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. SC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 26, 2012
474 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6612

07-26-2012

KENNETH RAY MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SC, STATE OF; RICHLAND CO, all ect, Defendants - Appellees.

Kenneth Ray Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00153-CMC)

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Ray Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Ray Mitchell appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. S.C., No. 3:12-cv-00153-CMC (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Mitchell v. SC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 26, 2012
474 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Mitchell v. SC

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH RAY MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SC, STATE OF; RICHLAND CO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 26, 2012

Citations

474 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Vanzant v. Wilcox

The Court must dismiss a complaint or any portion thereof that states a frivolous or malicious claim, fails…

Stakey v. O'Brien

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Review of a complaint under § 1915A is akin to a review following a motion to…