Mitchell v. Providence Heath Plan

Full title: NICOLE M. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENCE HEATH PLAN, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Sep 7, 2010

10-CV-267-PK (D. Or. Sep. 7, 2010)

Opinion

10-CV-267-PK.

September 7, 2010

NICOLE M. MITCHELL, Portland, OR, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

AARON. T. BALS, ARDEN J. OLSEN, Harrang Long Gary Rudnick, PC, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Defendant.

ORDER

ANNA BROWN, District JudgePage 2

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#15) on June 23, 2010, in which he recommends this Court deny Plaintiff Nicole M. Mitchell's Motion (#5) to Remand.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9^th Cir. 1983) (rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8^th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#15). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#5) to Remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 7th day of September, 2010.