From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 15, 2008
278 F. App'x 714 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-17065.

Submitted May 12, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

May 15, 2008.

Joseph Mitchell, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Susan Yvonne Illston, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-04619-S1.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


A review of the record and the response to this court's March 14, 2008 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Appellant is not in the custody of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"). He therefore cannot challenge ICE's action or inaction regarding his removal. See Campos v. INS, 62 F.3d 311, 314 (9th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 15, 2008
278 F. App'x 714 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Joseph MITCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 15, 2008

Citations

278 F. App'x 714 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Mendia v. Garcia

See Zolicoffer v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 315 F.3d 538, 541 (5th Cir. 2003); Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d…

Mendia v. Garcia

See Zolicoffer v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 315 F.3d 538, 541 (5th Cir. 2003); Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d…