holding that "as a matter of law [plaintiff's] allegations that the hospital interfered with his relationships with his patients fail to state a claim for relief under Title VII."
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Greater S.E. Comm. Hosp. Corp.No. 88-916.
February 21, 1989.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 853 F. 2d 762.
holding that "as a matter of law [plaintiff's] allegations that the hospital interfered with his relationships with his patients fail to state a claim for relief under Title VII."
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Greater S.E. Comm. Hosp. Corp.applying test similar to Spirides analysis
Summary of this case from Comm. on Human Relations v. SuburbanFull title:MITCHELL ET AL. v. FRANK R. HOWARD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 21, 1989
In balancing the State's interest in efficient provision of public services against the employee's speech…
Vakharia v. Swedish Covenant Hosp.The discrimination targeted by Title VII "relates to the field of employment," 1 A. Larson L. Larson,…