From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Felker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
No. 2:08-cv-1196 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-1196 JAM EFB P

02-11-2013

ROBERT MITCHELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On February 6, 2013, the court heard plaintiffs' motion to compel. Dckt. No. 144. Attorneys Damon McClain and Marisa Kirschenbauer appeared at the hearing on behalf of defendants; attorney Geoffrey Holtz appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. As stated on the record and for the reasons stated on the record, plaintiffs' motion is granted, in part, as follows:

1. Plaintiffs may depose Matthew Cate and Dr. Jeffrey Beard. Each deposition shall not exceed four hours. Plaintiffs' request for an order directing defendants "to produce Dr. Beard's reports analyzing and making recommendations regarding CDCR's lockdown policy and related documents," Dckt. No. 146 at 10, is denied, without prejudice.

2. Defendants shall produce all e-mails relevant to the noticed depositions by March 8, 2013. Defendants shall produce all remaining electronic discovery by March 29, 2013.

3. The Clerk shall terminate docket entry 142.

So Ordered.

____________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Felker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
No. 2:08-cv-1196 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MITCHELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-1196 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)