From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. City of Dayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 14, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-198 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-198

10-14-2015

KATHERINE MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #16), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed on September 21, 2015 (Doc. #16) is ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #3) is DISMISSED; and

3. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
Date: 10-14-15

/s/_________

Walter H. Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mitchell v. City of Dayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 14, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-198 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Mitchell v. City of Dayton

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Oct 14, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-198 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 14, 2015)

Citing Cases

Edwards v. Towne Props.

As previously noted, dismissal for want of prosecution is appropriate where plaintiff fails to keep the Court…