From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. City of Barstow

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 5, 2024
5:22-cv-01014-MWF-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2024)

Opinion

5:22-cv-01014-MWF-DTBx

06-05-2024

DENISE MITCHELL; and K.M., a minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem DANIEL DWIGHT GRAHAM, both individually and as successors in interest to Decedent KENNETH EARL MACKEY, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BARSTOW; NATHANIEL ARIAS; and DOES 2-10. inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the stipulation by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys of record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause Hearing, previously scheduled for June 24, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. City of Barstow

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 5, 2024
5:22-cv-01014-MWF-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Mitchell v. City of Barstow

Case Details

Full title:DENISE MITCHELL; and K.M., a minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 5, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-01014-MWF-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2024)