From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3093 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-3093 EFB P

05-07-2013

RODNEY D. MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. BITER, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Petitioner also requests this action be stayed. However, petitioner has commenced this action in the wrong district.

Petitioner was convicted in the San Luis Obispo Superior Court, but is confined in Kern County. Although this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted both have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 499-500 (1973), witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in the county of conviction, Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Therefore, the court takes no action on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis and motion to stay, and transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. §§ 84(c); 1404(a).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

_________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3093 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY D. MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. BITER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 7, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-3093 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)