From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitaga Corp. v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 4, 2024
2:24-cv-02954-FMO-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-02954-FMO-AJR

06-04-2024

MITAGA CORP Plaintiffs, v. PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al. Defendant(s).


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Mitaga Corp. v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 4, 2024
2:24-cv-02954-FMO-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Mitaga Corp. v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MITAGA CORP Plaintiffs, v. PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 4, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-02954-FMO-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2024)