From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mischne v. Firestone Tire Rubber Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
183 A. 213 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Decided January 31st, 1936.

Appeal of Louis H. Panter.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Mr. Remsen Cowenhoven and Mr. Louis L. Hendler, for the complainant-appellant.

Messrs. Bilder, Bilder Kauffman, for the defendant-respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 116 N.J. Eq. 305 (under the name of Nischne v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.).

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Mischne v. Firestone Tire Rubber Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
183 A. 213 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Mischne v. Firestone Tire Rubber Co.

Case Details

Full title:RAY MISCHNE, complainant-appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1936

Citations

183 A. 213 (N.J. 1936)
183 A. 213

Citing Cases

Kaible v. Gropack

Moreover, "implied notice is invocable to protect the innocent." Id. at 366-67 (quoting Nischne v. Firestone…

In re Mrs. Weinberg's Kosher Foods, Inc.

However, intermediate New Jersey appellate courts have indicated that it is limited, and a wrongdoer may not…