From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miscellaneous Orders

U.S.
Dec 4, 2000
531 U.S. 1041 (2000)

Opinion

DECEMBER 4, 2000


00-6582 ROSE v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 1355.

00-6597 PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal. Certiorari denied.

00-6606 MILLER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1153.

00-6684 GREENE v. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 N.C. 562, 528 S.E.2d 575.

00-6689 PATTERSON v. PIERSON, WARDEN. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6696 VALDEZ v. UNITED STATES;

00-6738 RAMIREZ-CAPRISTO v. UNITED STATES;

00-6742 DIAZ-RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES;

00-6759 TOVAR-ORTEGA v. UNITED STATES;

00-6891 TORRES-MONTES v. UNITED STATES;

00-6913 GUZMAN-DIAZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6703 KAMINSKY v. FLORIDA. Dist.Ct.App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 765 So.2d 716.

00-6714 CRANSHAW v. CHESNEY, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AT FRACKVILLE. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6725 McNEILL v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Lorain County. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 137 Ohio App.3d 34, 738 N.E.2d 23.

00-6729 ROBERTS v. LUEBBERS, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6776 CASTILLO v. ARTUZ, SUPERINTENDENT, GREEN HAVEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6777 SARMIENTO v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 909.

00-6798 ROMANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 898.


Summaries of

Miscellaneous Orders

U.S.
Dec 4, 2000
531 U.S. 1041 (2000)
Case details for

Miscellaneous Orders

Case Details

Full title:MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 4, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1041 (2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Wood

Additionally, "[a]lthoughdefendant assigns plain error to this issue, it is well-settled that `plain error…

State v. Wolfe

Defendant requests plain error review of the issue, but the plain error doctrine is limited to errors in jury…