From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mirelez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 25, 2002
804 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 5D01-2263

Opinion filed January 25, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Ann Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


We affirm the conviction but remand to the trial court to correct an inconsistency between the orally pronounced sentence and the written sentence as to Count XIV. The trial court orally pronounced a five year sentence while the written sentence imposed a prison term of 15 years for this count. The error is clear and its correction does not change the aggregate sentence appellant received.

Therefore, the appellant's conviction is affirmed and the matter is remanded for correction of the sentence as to Count XIV.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mirelez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 25, 2002
804 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Mirelez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAIME MIRELEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 25, 2002

Citations

804 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)