From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miranda v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 22, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.).


Although defendant Transit Authority urges that it has been prejudiced by plaintiff's delay in filing a notice of claim and that plaintiff's motion for leave to file a late notice of claim should have been denied, accident reports prepared by the bus driver and a supervisor immediately after the subject accident, documenting the circumstances of plaintiff's injury, provided defendant with timely actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim ( see, General Municipal Law § 50-e). Accordingly, defendant's claim of prejudice is fatally undermined.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.


Summaries of

Miranda v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Miranda v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:ROSA MIRANDA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 352

Citing Cases

Clarke v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

Due to a clerical law office error, petitioner did not timely file a notice of claim within the 90–day filing…