From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minus v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 22, 2020
17 CIVIL 4827 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2020)

Opinion

17 CIVIL 4827 (VSB)

09-22-2020

OMAR MINUS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and JASON MILLER, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated September 22, 2020, because Plaintiff has failed to set forth any facts showing that there is a genuine dispute for trial regarding his § 1983 malicious prosecution claim, the Court need not reach the questions of whether Miller is entitled to qualified immunity on this claim, or whether the City of New York is subject to municipal liability. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

September 22, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Minus v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 22, 2020
17 CIVIL 4827 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Minus v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:OMAR MINUS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and JASON MILLER, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 22, 2020

Citations

17 CIVIL 4827 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2020)