From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minott v. Duffy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 16, 2014
11 Civ. 1217 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2014)

Opinion

11 Civ. 1217 (KPF)

05-16-2014

HOPETON MINOTT, Plaintiff, v. POLICE OFFICER JAMES DUFFY, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge:

There is a letter motion pending on the docket regarding an extension of time to file certain documents. (Dkt. #45). The letter in question should not have been construed as a motion. Moreover the issue to which it refers has long since been resolved by the Court. (Dkt. #46, 66). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket entry 45.

SO ORDERED. Dated: May 16, 2014

New York, New York

__________

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Minott v. Duffy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 16, 2014
11 Civ. 1217 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Minott v. Duffy

Case Details

Full title:HOPETON MINOTT, Plaintiff, v. POLICE OFFICER JAMES DUFFY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 16, 2014

Citations

11 Civ. 1217 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2014)